Ocean Transportation

The Federal Maritime Commission (FMC) has initiated investigations in Houston, Seattle, South Florida, and New York to enforce regulations on licensed Ocean Transportation Intermediaries (OTIs), emphasizing compliance with the Shipping Act of 1984. Concurrently, the FMC is scrutinizing the World Shipping Council's limited antitrust immunity agreement, which involves major shipping companies like Maersk and MSC, poten…

FMC Enforces Regulations on Licensed Ocean Transportation Intermediaries

The Federal Maritime Commission (FMC) has launched investigations in key U.S. regions, including Houston, Seattle, South Florida, and New York, to enforce compliance with regulations governing licensed Ocean Transportation Intermediaries (OTIs). The order has been issued under the Shipping Act of 1984, underscoring the importance of adhering to established maritime laws and protocols.

Strict Compliance for Ocean Transportation Intermediaries

OTIs are required to renew their licenses every three years, and they must not employ unlicensed or unbonded agents. This mandate is part of the final OTI rules that were approved on October 25, 2015. The FMC's latest order serves as a reminder of these obligations, reaffirming the significance of maintaining industry standards and legal compliance.

The enforcement efforts are designed to ensure that OTIs operate within the legal framework, promoting fair competition and transparency in the maritime industry. Any deviation from these regulations could result in legal challenges and potential penalties.

Antitrust Immunity and the WSC Agreement

In addition to focusing on OTIs, the FMC is scrutinizing the World Shipping Council's (WSC) limited antitrust immunity agreement. The WSC, which represents 90% of global liner services, was granted this limited immunity in 2020, allowing for certain activities such as information exchange among its members. These members include major international shipping companies like Maersk, MSC, and CMA CGM.

The FMC is reviewing the WSC agreement to assess its compliance with regulatory expectations. FMC Chairman Louis Sola has been critical of the WSC, and the council has previously sued the FMC over a new detention rule. The outcome of this scrutiny could have significant implications for the competitive dynamics within the shipping industry.

Potential Legal Challenges and Industry Impact

The WSC's current agreement, which was filed under the Shipping Act five years ago, is now under the FMC's microscope. Legal challenges may arise if the agreement is found to be misaligned with regulatory standards. The decision could set a precedent for reevaluating similar agreements, influencing the competitive landscape of international shipping.

The FMC's order and the subsequent response from the WSC are highly anticipated, as they could alter the framework within which ocean carriers operate. Such changes could affect how carriers file agreements with the FMC and the extent of their antitrust immunity.

Industry Reactions and Future Considerations

A recent panel discussion on the OTI community, held on September 21, highlighted the industry's focus on regulatory compliance and the potential implications of the FMC's actions. As the FMC continues to enforce and scrutinize industry practices, stakeholders are advised to stay informed about regulatory developments and prepare for possible shifts in the industry landscape.

The ongoing investigations and reviews demonstrate the FMC's commitment to upholding maritime regulations and ensuring fair competition. As the situation evolves, the maritime industry will likely continue to monitor the FMC's actions closely and adjust operations to align with regulatory expectations.

"The decision could alter competitive dynamics and set a precedent for reevaluating similar agreements."